[CBW_Exec] CBW 2011 proposals for review

Shannon Carter Shannon_Carter at tamu-commerce.edu
Thu Sep 2 06:55:37 CDT 2010


Isn't it?! We think so, too.

Actually, we were thinking that we really *can• accept all of them,  
unless you guys think that won't be a good idea.

As noted in the review guide below, we can accept up to

--4 presentors for morning Open Panel
--4 additional presentors for afternoon Open Panel
--as many as we want for the concurrent roundtable sessions at the end  
of the day

Here's the relevant bit from review guide below.

Thanks!
" 2. With your reading, we are just looking for a list of those we  
should absolutely accept and perhaps a list of those we should really  
try NOT  to accept (if any)
>
> If you have the time/inclination, we'd also love to hear which of  
> the two presentation formats you'd like to see each accepted  
> presentation participate in:
>
> (a) Panel Presentation (audience, entire workshop--morning session,  
> afternoon session)
> (b) Roundtable Presentation (audience, much smaller group selecting  
> that particular roundtable presentation)
>
> Both of the two above will feature short (8-10 min) presentations,  
> followed by discussion. We'd like to limit the Morning and Afternoon  
> Panel Sessions to no more than Four presenters. We can offer as many  
> roundtables as we'd like since those will run concurrently.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, "J. Elizabeth Clark"  
<lclark at lagcc.cuny.edu> wrote:

> Wow!  I can't believe the response we got!  This is a definite point- 
> of-note for future CBWs.  There's clearly strong interest out  
> there.  I'm assuming (should I?  Not sure) that we can't accept them  
> all, so I've put my top 5 in order:
>
>
> 1.  SUNY New Paltz
> 2.  Delaware
> 3.  Purdue Calamet
> 4.  Henry Ford
> 5.   Dubuque
>
>
> My criteria were:  how much of an impact the program had, how much  
> might be replicable/speak to conditions elsewhere, how this extends  
> the conversation of BW.  Happy to revisit both recommendations and  
> how I arrived at my rankings.  (They are not firm!  Just getting us  
> started!)
>
>
> Also, Barbara, I think you should invite Leslie Norris to submit to  
> BWe.
>
>
> Liz
>
> J. Elizabeth Clark, Ph.D.
> Professor of English
> LaGuardia Community College--CUNY
> e-mail:  lclark at lagcc.cuny.edu
> Phone:  718.482.5665 http://faculty.lagcc.cuny.edu/eclark
>
>>>> "Shannon Carter"  09/01/10 11:23 AM >>>
> Attached are the proposals and the workshop proposal. Please see  
> below for more information to help guide your review.
>
> Thanks, reviewers!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cbw_exec-bounces at tamu-commerce.edu on behalf of Shannon Carter
> Sent: Wed 9/1/2010 9:54 AM
> To: Conference of Basic Writing Executive Board; Conference of Basic  
> Writing Executive Board
> Subject: Re: [CBW_Exec] CBW 2011 update and request
>
> Thanks, everyone, for your quick replies and generosity! We know  
> this is an incredibly busy time, so Hannah and I are all the more  
> grateful to you.
>
> I have down as potential reviewers . . .
>
> -Susan
> -Liz
> -Barbara
> -Greg
> -Allen
>
>
> Sarah also threw in her hat, if we end up needing more ("sorely  
> needed," right Sarah?)
>
> Still room for more reviewers so keep those offers coming!
>
> Here's a plan:
>
> 1. I'll send another email to the reviewers above so they can get  
> started, with a potential turnaround time of Wednesday of next week.
>
> 2. With your reading, we are just looking for a list of those we  
> should absolutely accept and perhaps a list of those we should  
> really try not to accept.
>
> If you have the time/inclination, we'd also love to hear which of  
> the two presentation formats you'd like to see each accepted  
> presentation participate in:
>
> (a) Panel Presentation (audience, entire workshop--morning session,  
> afternoon session)
> (b) Roundtable Presentation (audience, much smaller group selecting  
> that particular roundtable presentation)
>
> Both of the two above will feature short (8-10 min) presentations,  
> followed by discussion. We'd like to limit the Morning and Afternoon  
> Panel Sessions to no more than Four presenters. We can offer as many  
> roundtables as we'd like since those will run concurrently.
>
> 3. Send those evaluations to me (and Hannah) by Wednesday of next  
> week.
>
> 4. We'll get notifications out soon after, and continue working with  
> graduate students and one another to place accepted presenters on  
> program for CBW 2011.
>
> Thanks!
> Shannon
>
>
>
>
>




More information about the CBW_Exec mailing list