I agree with Susan as well.<div><br></div><div>Rebecca<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Marisa Klages <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mklages@lagcc.cuny.edu">mklages@lagcc.cuny.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">me too!<br>
<br>
Marisa<br>
<br>
Dr. Marisa A. Klages<br>
Associate Professor<br>
Director, Outcomes Assessment<br>
LaGuardia Community College-- CUNY<br>
<a href="tel:718-482-5677" value="+17184825677">718-482-5677</a><br>
<a href="mailto:mklages@lagcc.cuny.edu">mklages@lagcc.cuny.edu</a><br>
<br>
>>> Susan Naomi Bernstein <<a href="mailto:susan.naomi@gmail.com">susan.naomi@gmail.com</a>> 8/22/2011 11:18 AM >>><br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Since it's volunteer graphic artist labor, I vote for "liking" the blue<br>
unequivocally -- and leaving it as is.<br>
<br>
Peace and best,<br>
<br>
Susan<br>
<br>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:16 AM, J. Elizabeth Clark<br>
<<a href="mailto:lclark@lagcc.cuny.edu">lclark@lagcc.cuny.edu</a>>wrote:<br>
<br>
> It sounds like we're overwhelmingly for blue. Since this is being done by a<br>
> volunteer, how strongly do you feel about getting rid of the dots and<br>
> changing the size of the font for the BW? I can go back to her again, but if<br>
> we "like" it, then I won't. I'm clear that we like the blue. I'm not clear<br>
> where we're at with the other changes that have been suggested.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Thanks everyone!<br>
><br>
><br>
> Liz<br>
><br>
> J. Elizabeth Clark, Ph.D.<br>
> Professor of English<br>
> LaGuardia Community College--CUNY<br>
> e-mail: <a href="mailto:lclark@lagcc.cuny.edu">lclark@lagcc.cuny.edu</a><br>
> Phone: <a href="tel:718.482.5665" value="+17184825665">718.482.5665</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.jelizabethclark.com" target="_blank">www.jelizabethclark.com</a><br>
> >>> "Lalicker, William" 08/22/11 10:42 AM >>><br>
> Shannon, I agree. The crispness of the blue trumps the visual interest of<br>
> the reflection. And the kind of dotted line motif suggests development and<br>
> growth, I think...so I vote for the blue. --Bill<br>
><br>
> William B. Lalicker, Ph.D.<br>
> Professor of English (Main Hall, Room 534, <a href="tel:610.436.2268" value="+16104362268">610.436.2268</a>)<br>
> Dean's Assistant for Student Issues (Anderson Hall, Room 119C,<br>
> <a href="tel:610.436.3521" value="+16104363521">610.436.3521</a>)<br>
> College of Arts and Sciences<br>
> West Chester University<br>
> West Chester, PA 19383<br>
> <a href="mailto:wlalicker@wcupa.edu">wlalicker@wcupa.edu</a><br>
><br>
> From: <a href="mailto:cbw_exec-bounces@tamu-commerce.edu">cbw_exec-bounces@tamu-commerce.edu</a> [mailto:<br>
> <a href="mailto:cbw_exec-bounces@tamu-commerce.edu">cbw_exec-bounces@tamu-commerce.edu</a>] On Behalf Of Shannon Carter<br>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:46 AM<br>
> To: Conference of Basic Writing Executive Board; <a href="mailto:tpeele@boisestate.edu">tpeele@boisestate.edu</a>;<br>
> <a href="mailto:cbw_exec@tamu-commerce.edu">cbw_exec@tamu-commerce.edu</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [CBW_Exec] New Logo<br>
><br>
><br>
> lovely! I REALLY like the blue, for some reason. Crisp, vivid, dynamic. I<br>
> like the reflection on the other, but it seems less legible and . . . well,<br>
> blue seems right to me. Love the dotted line connecting the C with the BW.<br>
><br>
> Nice!<br>
><br>
><br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:cbw_exec-bounces@tamu-commerce.edu">cbw_exec-bounces@tamu-commerce.edu</a> on behalf of J. Elizabeth Clark<br>
> Sent: Wed 8/17/2011 7:58 AM<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:tpeele@boisestate.edu">tpeele@boisestate.edu</a>; <a href="mailto:cbw_exec@tamu-commerce.edu">cbw_exec@tamu-commerce.edu</a><br>
> Subject: [CBW_Exec] New Logo<br>
><br>
> i there,<br>
><br>
><br>
> How do you like these new logos? Can we decide on one of these, or would<br>
> you like additional choices (these are based on our last go around of<br>
> comments in June).<br>
><br>
><br>
> Liz<br>
><br>
> J. Elizabeth Clark, Ph.D.<br>
> Professor of English<br>
> LaGuardia Community College--CUNY<br>
> e-mail: <a href="mailto:lclark@lagcc.cuny.edu">lclark@lagcc.cuny.edu</a><br>
> Phone: <a href="tel:718.482.5665" value="+17184825665">718.482.5665</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.jelizabethclark.com" target="_blank">www.jelizabethclark.com</a><br>
> >>> Thomas Peele 07/11/11 11:07 AM >>><br>
> Thanks for this alert, Shannon. A comprehensive Wikipedia entry would be a<br>
> great, on-going project for graduate courses in basic writing theory and<br>
> pedagogy.<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Shannon Carter <<br>
> <a href="mailto:Shannon_Carter@tamu-commerce.edu">Shannon_Carter@tamu-commerce.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > **<br>
> ><br>
> > Hi, all--<br>
> ><br>
> > Hope your summer is excellent!<br>
> ><br>
> > Just wanted to share that BW is on Wikipedia now, which you may already<br>
> > know. Perhaps one of the EB wrote it! Yay! Hannah has been suggesting<br>
> this<br>
> > for some time, and I was so glad to see it!<br>
> ><br>
> > It's at: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_writing" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_writing</a><br>
> ><br>
> > Only thing is this: IT IS ABOUT TO BE REMOVED. OR MAY BE REMOVED.<br>
> ><br>
> > See--<br>
> > <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Basic_writing#Synthesis" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Basic_writing#Synthesis</a><br>
> ><br>
> > REVISIONS NECESSARY, IT APPEARS. TOO ACADEMIC. Not yet within the genre<br>
> of<br>
> > "encyclopedia."<br>
> ><br>
> > I'd hate to see this happen. Anyone able to take this on?<br>
> ><br>
> > Here's what they need to happen (from url above)--<br>
> > This is obviously an essay prepared as if for some professional<br>
> > publication. It shows the typical patter of focus on a few specific<br>
> topics,<br>
> > rather than encyclopedic coverage: it deals with the work of some<br>
> selective<br>
> > figures, rather than the field as a whole ,citing almost entirely from<br>
> their<br>
> > writings. I presume it was copied directly from something published<br>
> > elsewhere, but even if it was written directly for Wikipedia, it is not<br>
> > encyclopedic. Almost the entire text was contributed by two editors who<br>
> have<br>
> > contributed nothing else, and two ips, both geolocating to the same<br>
> network<br>
> > in the Western US.<br>
> ><br>
> > The following needs to be done:<br>
> ><br>
> > 1. a considerable part of the treatment of the key authors needs to be<br>
> > moved to the articles about them individually, if not already present<br>
> there.<br>
> > 2. A range of secondary and tertiary sources needs to be consulted<br>
> > 3. all major theoretical and practical strands in the subject need to<br>
> be<br>
> > at least mentioned<br>
> > 4. a slightly wider range of external websites with resources on the<br>
> > subject needs to be listed.<br>
> ><br>
> > If nobody responds here, as is likely, I'll probably stubbify it or --if<br>
> I<br>
> > have a chance -- rewrite it. DGG ( talk ) 09:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)<br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > CBW_Exec mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:CBW_Exec@tamu-commerce.edu">CBW_Exec@tamu-commerce.edu</a><br>
> > <a href="http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec" target="_blank">http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CBW_Exec mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CBW_Exec@tamu-commerce.edu">CBW_Exec@tamu-commerce.edu</a><br>
> <a href="http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec" target="_blank">http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CBW_Exec mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CBW_Exec@tamu-commerce.edu">CBW_Exec@tamu-commerce.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec" target="_blank">http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>