[CBW_Exec] CBW 2011 proposals for review

Fri Sep 3 08:33:14 CDT 2010

Thanks, Greg!

-----Original Message-----
From: cbw_exec-bounces at tamu-commerce.edu on behalf of Gregory R Glau
Sent: Thu 9/2/2010 11:45 AM
To: Conference of Basic Writing Executive Board
Subject: Re: [CBW_Exec] CBW 2011 proposals for review

Hi, all,

Here is my ranked list, and I tend to think these are all OK and would be interesting and if you can use them all, I'd do so.

Delaware - Melissa Ianetta - reports on large BW grant centering on coalition-building
SUNY at New Paltz - Rachel Rigolino - funding issues / coalition-building through collaboration
Purdue/Calument - Liz Bryant - building coalitions
Henry Ford CC - Mike Hill - institutional context affecting change
Washington State - Wendy Olson - BW from a CC perspective
University of Dubuque - Jessica Schreyer - collaborative work focusing on contingent faculty
Old Dominion - Leslie Norris - BW and digital texts
Indiana University / Purdue - Sara Webb-Sunderhaus - exp w/two coalirions in the Writing Workshop
Rowan University (?) - Kristine Stevens-Piazza - learning patterns of BW
Notre Dame - Nicole MacLaughin - interactions with athletics

thanks and best,

gg
-------------------------------------------------
Greg Glau
Associate Professor and Director, University Writing Program
Northern Arizona University
Department of English - PO 6032
Flagstaff, AZ 86011-6032

Office: 928 523 6713
Fax:    928 523 7074

On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:55 AM, Shannon Carter wrote:

Isn't it?! We think so, too.

Actually, we were thinking that we really *can. accept all of them,
unless you guys think that won't be a good idea.

As noted in the review guide below, we can accept up to

--4 presentors for morning Open Panel
--4 additional presentors for afternoon Open Panel
--as many as we want for the concurrent roundtable sessions at the end
of the day

Here's the relevant bit from review guide below.

Thanks!
" 2. With your reading, we are just looking for a list of those we
should absolutely accept and perhaps a list of those we should really
try NOT  to accept (if any)

If you have the time/inclination, we'd also love to hear which of
the two presentation formats you'd like to see each accepted
presentation participate in:

(a) Panel Presentation (audience, entire workshop--morning session,
afternoon session)
(b) Roundtable Presentation (audience, much smaller group selecting
that particular roundtable presentation)

Both of the two above will feature short (8-10 min) presentations,
followed by discussion. We'd like to limit the Morning and Afternoon
Panel Sessions to no more than Four presenters. We can offer as many
roundtables as we'd like since those will run concurrently.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, "J. Elizabeth Clark"
<lclark at lagcc.cuny.edu<mailto:lclark at lagcc.cuny.edu>> wrote:

Wow!  I can't believe the response we got!  This is a definite point-
of-note for future CBWs.  There's clearly strong interest out
there.  I'm assuming (should I?  Not sure) that we can't accept them
all, so I've put my top 5 in order:

1.  SUNY New Paltz
2.  Delaware
3.  Purdue Calamet
4.  Henry Ford
5.   Dubuque

My criteria were:  how much of an impact the program had, how much
might be replicable/speak to conditions elsewhere, how this extends
the conversation of BW.  Happy to revisit both recommendations and
how I arrived at my rankings.  (They are not firm!  Just getting us
started!)

Also, Barbara, I think you should invite Leslie Norris to submit to
BWe.

Liz

J. Elizabeth Clark, Ph.D.
Professor of English
LaGuardia Community College--CUNY
e-mail:  lclark at lagcc.cuny.edu<mailto:lclark at lagcc.cuny.edu>
Phone:  718.482.5665 http://faculty.lagcc.cuny.edu/eclark

"Shannon Carter"  09/01/10 11:23 AM >>>
Attached are the proposals and the workshop proposal. Please see
below for more information to help guide your review.

Thanks, reviewers!

-----Original Message-----
From: cbw_exec-bounces at tamu-commerce.edu<mailto:cbw_exec-bounces at tamu-commerce.edu> on behalf of Shannon Carter
Sent: Wed 9/1/2010 9:54 AM
To: Conference of Basic Writing Executive Board; Conference of Basic
Writing Executive Board
Subject: Re: [CBW_Exec] CBW 2011 update and request

Thanks, everyone, for your quick replies and generosity! We know
this is an incredibly busy time, so Hannah and I are all the more
grateful to you.

I have down as potential reviewers . . .

-Susan
-Liz
-Barbara
-Greg
-Allen

Sarah also threw in her hat, if we end up needing more ("sorely
needed," right Sarah?)

Still room for more reviewers so keep those offers coming!

Here's a plan:

1. I'll send another email to the reviewers above so they can get
started, with a potential turnaround time of Wednesday of next week.

2. With your reading, we are just looking for a list of those we
should absolutely accept and perhaps a list of those we should
really try not to accept.

If you have the time/inclination, we'd also love to hear which of
the two presentation formats you'd like to see each accepted
presentation participate in:

(a) Panel Presentation (audience, entire workshop--morning session,
afternoon session)
(b) Roundtable Presentation (audience, much smaller group selecting
that particular roundtable presentation)

Both of the two above will feature short (8-10 min) presentations,
followed by discussion. We'd like to limit the Morning and Afternoon
Panel Sessions to no more than Four presenters. We can offer as many
roundtables as we'd like since those will run concurrently.

3. Send those evaluations to me (and Hannah) by Wednesday of next
week.

4. We'll get notifications out soon after, and continue working with
graduate students and one another to place accepted presenters on
program for CBW 2011.

Thanks!
Shannon

_______________________________________________
CBW_Exec mailing list
CBW_Exec at tamu-commerce.edu<mailto:CBW_Exec at tamu-commerce.edu>
http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6037 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.tamuc.edu/pipermail/cbw_exec/attachments/20100903/f8fa0bea/attachment.bin