[CBW_Exec] CCCC 2009 (Take 2)

[Rebecca Mlynarczyk]

Dear Shannon and All,

I think you've done a great job on this complex task. I've just made a few
minor editing suggestions, typos, etc., using the track changes feature.
See attached file. Hope this is helpful.

Rebecca

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Shannon Carter <
Shannon_Carter at tamu-commerce.edu> wrote:

>  Hi, all--
>
> Thanks for your great feedback and suggestions. I think I've
> incorporated/addressed the changes/concerns Kathleen pointed out. Just two
> things, Kathleen: (1) at the "breakout groups" section in the afternoon
> (2:45-3:30), you suggest "Maybe start with who is doing this first part?"
> I'm a little confused there, so I'm not quite sure how to address your
> question. Maybe Hannah can jump in here? We sort of divided it up so one was
> responsible for the morning and hte other was primarily responsible for the
> afternoon (Hannah's was the afternoon). (2) Yep, Elizabeth Campbell is a new
> board member. I understand Barbara Gleason put the name forward and we voted
> her in during our Executive Board meeting. At least that's what I
> understand. Thanks for your suggestions and guidance!
>
> Contact info: I've tried to get the changes to contact information worked
> out. Let me know if we need to make any additional changes/additions.
>
> Title: Thanks for your great suggestion, Rebecca! Susan was unhappy with
> the original title for similar reasons, but I was stubborn (imagine that!).
> My thought/hope was that the title was working directly against the notion
> that what students called "basic writers" can't do  should be the focus of
> our work (calling forward the amazing work of folks like Kurtz and
> Adler-Kassner and Mutnick and Gray-Rosendale and now Roozen[among others]
> that shows us the many, many intellectually-rigorous activities in which our
> students are involved every single day). So my hope was that the readers
> would get exactly the opposite notion from the original title. But that's
> two votes against it, suggesting that we absolutely need to change it. And I
> like the one you offered better, so if there are no objections I'd like to
> go with that one.
>
> I think we'll try to get it into the system this weekend, just in case we
> run into any difficulties. I'm very concerned this will be too long, but
> we'll see what the limits are and get it in from there.
>
> Thanks for your input! Attached is the revision, just in case you have any
> additional ideas/suggestions.
>
> --Shannon
>
> Shannon Carter
> Associate Professor of English
> Texas A&M-Commerce
> shannon_carter at tamu-commerce.edu
> http://faculty.tamu-commerce.edu/scarter/
> 903-886-5492
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CBW_Exec mailing list
> CBW_Exec at tamu-commerce.edu
> http://mailman.tamu-commerce.edu/mailman/listinfo/cbw_exec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.tamuc.edu/pipermail/cbw_exec/attachments/20080503/a8edab04/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CBW workshop draft Rebecca's edits.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 82432 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.tamuc.edu/pipermail/cbw_exec/attachments/20080503/a8edab04/CBWworkshopdraftRebeccasedits.doc